We are using cookies to implement functions like login, shopping cart or language selection for this website. Furthermore we use Google Analytics to create anonymized statistical reports of the usage which creates Cookies too. You will find more information in our privacy policy.
OK, I agree I do not want Google Analytics-Cookies
Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry
Login:
username:

password:

Plattform:

Forgotten password?

Registration

Oral Health Prev Dent 11 (2013), No. 1     14. Mar. 2013
Oral Health Prev Dent 11 (2013), No. 1  (14.03.2013)

Page 17-22, doi:10.3290/j.ohpd.a29371, PubMed:23507677


Effect of Clinician's Experience, Age, Gender and Calibration on the Assessment of Halitosis
Evirgen, Şehrazat / Kamburoğlu, Kıvanç / Gulsahi, Ayse
Purpose: To evaluate the diagnosis of halitosis in relation to the oral malodour judge's experience, age, gender and calibration.
Materials and Methods: This study included 38 dental patients who volunteered to participate. Patients were evaluated for halitosis by 6 clinicians using the organoleptic method and by measuring mouth exhaled air using a halimeter, which is considered the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for each clinician. Consistency between clinicians was evaluated through a kappa test. Significance level was set at P < 0.05.
Results: Out of the 38 patients, 14 were diagnosed with halitosis by 6 clinicians using a halimeter. The highest sensitivity (89%) was found for clinician No. 6, followed by clinician No. 5 (78%). Specificities were 57% for clinician No. 4 and 36% for clinician No. 1 and No. 5. The most correct positive predictive value (halitosis according to halimeter readings) was made by clinician No. 6 (65%), who also had the highest rates (83%) of negative predictive value (no halitosis according to halimeter readings). There were no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) between the diagnoses of clinicians No. 1, 2, 3, 5, or 6; however, the diagnoses made by clinician No. 4 were statistically different (P < 0.05) than those of all other clinicians. The highest rate of agreement (44%) in diagnoses was between the two calibrated clinicians. However, there was no correlation between the halitosis diagnoses and the age, gender and years of experience of the clinicians.
Conclusions: This study indicates that calibration of clinicians is a significant factor in the organoleptic evaluation of halitosis.

Keywords: bad breath, halitosis, oral clinician's calibration, organoleptic method